The process of business modelling is employed in order to
create an abstraction of an otherwise complex business. This will enable
business stakeholders (owners, customers, management, etc) to gain a better
understanding of the business functions and also promote business improvements
and/or innovation.
What is the connection between business and software
modelling ?
In order to survive in today's competitive world, businesses
have to continuously review their products, services, and relations with the environment
(suppliers, competitors, clients, laws, etc). To assess the quality of their
products and effectiveness of their services, businesses rely on the
information systems. Initially only a support component, the information
systems have now become an integral part of the businesses. The business itself
must define the requirements for the information system.
Unfortunately, very often the software system does not
properly support the business. The causes may be: lack of accurate requirements
definition, deficiencies in proper business understanding by the software
design team, or even the nature of the business (which may change so often that
the software simply cannot follow).
Software modelling is an accepted way of designing software
systems. By applying the modelling approach to the business itself, accurate
requirements may be achieved for the subsequent software design activity. This
concept was taken even further by the idea of using the same modelling language
for both software and business modelling.
One example of a language that could model both the business
and the software system belonging to the business is the Unified Modelling
Language, the UML. Many developers are already familiar with UML from modelling
software systems. Using one single language across the business and software
modelling would promote consistency and communication among modellers and also
take advantage of a whole range of modelling tools that support the UML.
Translating the business model into a software model is not a
straightforward process. Not all the classes and objects defined in a business
architecture may be mapped directly to a software model
Here’s a mapping of the IDEF to the UML
IDEF
|
UML
|
· IDEF0 :
Function modeling
· IDEF1 :
Information Modeling
· IDEF1X :
Data Modeling
· IDEF2 : Simulation Model Design
· IDEF3 :
Process Description Capture
· IDEF4 :
Object-Oriented Design
· IDEF5 :
Ontology Description Capture
|
· Activity Diagram
· Class Diagram
· Object Diagram
· Collaboration Diagram
· Activity/ State/ Use Case Diagram
· Class/ Object/ Activity/ State Diagram
· Meta
Object Facility
|
UML has primarily been conceived with software design in
mind, while IDEF have their origins in Computer Assisted Manufacturing. The
interesting fact is that each of these methodologies is being extended to cover
the other's domain. While UML is being extended now to cover business
modelling, the IDEF family is added new components that enable it to address
software (and information systems in general) development.
IDEF is coming from the manufacturing / information
environment and aims to cover object orientation, knowledge representation and
software development.
UML is still in its infancy; it comes from the domain of object-oriented
software development but there are increasing efforts to extend it towards
business process modelling.
Which method ? It is up to the user: the task, background,
resources, patterns… will all play a role in selecting the right tool for the
job.
reference:
Business Modelling: UML vs. IDEF
www.ict.griffith.edu.au/noran/Docs/UMLvsIDEF.pdf
0 comments:
Post a Comment